2016
DOI: 10.1515/9783110495850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grundlagen und Hauptgruppenelemente

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phosphorus atom P1 of 2‐benzyl‐1‐mesityl‐5,7‐dimethyl‐2,3‐dihydrophosphindole ( 2 ) is in a trigonal pyramidal environment with an angle sum of 302.1°. In unstrained PH 3 an angle sum of 280.3° (H–P–H 93.42°) [ 4 ] has been observed which is commonly explained by lack of sp 3 hybridization of the phosphorus atom leading to a P–H bond by interaction of a P‐centered p ‐orbital with the hydrogen atom. Increasingly bulky substituents induce steric strain and enhance the bond angles at the phosphorus atom.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The phosphorus atom P1 of 2‐benzyl‐1‐mesityl‐5,7‐dimethyl‐2,3‐dihydrophosphindole ( 2 ) is in a trigonal pyramidal environment with an angle sum of 302.1°. In unstrained PH 3 an angle sum of 280.3° (H–P–H 93.42°) [ 4 ] has been observed which is commonly explained by lack of sp 3 hybridization of the phosphorus atom leading to a P–H bond by interaction of a P‐centered p ‐orbital with the hydrogen atom. Increasingly bulky substituents induce steric strain and enhance the bond angles at the phosphorus atom.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing electronegativity differences (ΔEN) of P and E strengthen the ionic picture whereas small ΔEN values reduce the heteropolar nature of the P–E bonds. With Allred‐Rochow electronegativity values of 2.06 for phosphorus on the one hand and EN values of 3.50, 2.44, and 2.48 for oxygen, sulfur, and selenium [ 10 ] on the other, the by far most ionic P–E bond is expected for 2‐benzyl‐1‐mesityl‐5,7‐dimethyl‐2,3‐dihydrophosphindole 1‐oxide ( 2‐O , ΔEN PO = 1.44). The very similar and smaller electronegativity of S and Se leads to rather similar P–C bond lengths for 2‐S and 2‐Se (ΔEN PS = 0.38, ΔEN PSe = 0.42).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, S5 not only bridges the two Ni2 centers, but also interacts with the potassium counter ion (S5-K1: 3.378(2) Å). This distance is very close to the sum of their covalent radii (3.39 Å [53]) and it will take away at least some electron density from the Ni2-S5 bonds, thereby weakening them. With regard to assigning the two oxidation states (+2 and +3) to the inner and outer nickel centers, metrical structural parameters of the C-S and C=C bonds in the three dithiolene ligands of the asymmetric unit are also of interest.…”
Section: Bond Lengthsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This might contribute to elongation of the Ni-S bonds, despite a higher oxidation state. Notably, the longer ones of the Ni-S bonds, i.e., those which surpass 2.3 Å, mean that the Ni and S atoms have distances which are longer than the sum of their covalent radii (2.29 Å [53]), suggesting only comparably weak attraction/interaction. While Ni1 is clearly strongly coordinated by all four sulfur donor atoms of its two dithiolene ligands, three out of the five Ni-S interactions of Ni2 are significantly weakened beyond a typical Ni-S single bond.…”
Section: Bond Lengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%