“…In general, we find gaps in the evaluative management of the group activities in Brazil, which could be remedied with continuous evaluation when possible, external guidance, updated documentation, and quality control mechanisms (Veloso;Nativity, 2013). In any case, the literature deems evaluation of group projects as fundamental and, thus considers it as the main difficulty to be overcome (Beiras et al, 2020;Veloso;Natividade, 2013;(Rothman et al, 2003). In Latin America, self-assessment is the most widely used evaluation mechanism, despite its low reliability Rothman et al, 2003), a fact also confirmed in our panorama that, once again, enables the quantitative knowledge of gaps in the literature (Beiras et al, 2020;Toneli;Borders;Ried, 2017;Veloso;Nativity, 2013).…”