2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-012-0575-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GT0 Explosion Sources for IMS Infrasound Calibration: Charge Design and Yield Estimation from Near-source Observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the shock travels at speeds on the order of sonic velocity, a slight variation in travel distance can result in arrival times altered by a few milliseconds, Only fine mesh simulation results are considered a The raw experimental overpressure data read an OP max of 6.11 psi (42.1 kPa) for this 303-m sensor. However, Table 5 of [12] reports the peak overpressure at this 303-m sensor of 30.16 kPa. If the Table 5 of [12] data is taken as the true peak overpressure, percent difference in OP max is 3.4 % as opposed to −25.9 % mesh calculation, the results are roughly similar.…”
Section: Simulation Results: Overpressurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Even though the shock travels at speeds on the order of sonic velocity, a slight variation in travel distance can result in arrival times altered by a few milliseconds, Only fine mesh simulation results are considered a The raw experimental overpressure data read an OP max of 6.11 psi (42.1 kPa) for this 303-m sensor. However, Table 5 of [12] reports the peak overpressure at this 303-m sensor of 30.16 kPa. If the Table 5 of [12] data is taken as the true peak overpressure, percent difference in OP max is 3.4 % as opposed to −25.9 % mesh calculation, the results are roughly similar.…”
Section: Simulation Results: Overpressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Table 5 of [12] reports the peak overpressure at this 303-m sensor of 30.16 kPa. If the Table 5 of [12] data is taken as the true peak overpressure, percent difference in OP max is 3.4 % as opposed to −25.9 % mesh calculation, the results are roughly similar. The only deviation is that a sharp downward spike in the overpressure was seen at 130 ms at the 103-m sensor for the coarse calculation that was not present for the fine calculation.…”
Section: Simulation Results: Overpressurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations