Guest Editorial

Shukaitis, Stevphen; Figiel, Joanna

doi:10.1057/sub.2011.29

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The etymology comes from the classical Latin precārius : ‘given as a favour, depending on the favour of another, (of property) held by tenancy at will, uncertain, doubtful, suppliant’ and usage in English language is attested as early as the first half of the 17th century, especially in connection with tenancies ‘held or enjoyed by the favour of and at the pleasure of another person’ (Oxford English Dictionary 2nd Ed.). While this original meaning as related to land rights is now rarely applied, it adds a specific spatial dimension to other current etymologies that stress the sense of obtaining something by prayer, entreaty or favour (Shukaitis and Figiel ).…”

Section: Spatialising Precaritymentioning

confidence: 99%

Living precariously: property guardianship and the flexible city

Ferreri

Dawson

Vasudevan

2016

Trans Inst British Geog

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper we examine the precarious everyday geographies of property guardianship in the United Kingdom. Temporary property guardianship is a relatively new form of insecure urban dwelling existing in the grey area between informal occupation, the security industry and housing. Young individuals, usually in precarious employment, apply to intermediary companies to become temporary 'guardians' in metropolitan centres, most notably in London. The scheme allows guardians to pay below market rent to live in unusual locations while 'performing' live-in security arrangements that are not considered as a form of 'work'. The experiences of becoming and living as a property guardian can be ambivalent and contradictory: guardians express economic and social advantages to being temporary, while also exposing underlying anxieties with 'flexible living'. In this paper we offer a detailed description of the various practices of property guardianship and how they must be understood, on the one hand, in light of recent geographical scholarship on housing insecurity and, on the other hand, as an example of a precarious subjectivity that has become normalised in recent decades in cities of the global North. Drawing on in-depth interviews with long-term property guardians in London, we unpack the narratives and rationales of university-educated and highly skilled individuals for whom the city is a site of intensified insecurity and flexible negotiation. In the end, we conclude that the form of permanent temporariness experienced by property guardians needs to be understood as a symptom of wider dynamics of work and life precarisation in urban centres and argue that it is imperative to extend recent geographical debates around work and life insecurity to include new housing practices and their role in co-constituting urban precarity.

show abstract

Section: Spatialising Precaritymentioning

confidence: 99%