2014
DOI: 10.1787/9789264221475-en
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidance Document 116 on the Conduct and Design of Chronic Toxicity and Carcinogenicity Studies, Supporting Test Guidelines 451, 452 and 453

Abstract: Biomarker: A characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biologic processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacologic responses to a therapeutic intervention.Carcinogenicity: Substances are defined as carcinogenic if they induce tumours (benign or malignant), increase its incidence or shorten the time of tumour, when inhaled, ingested, dermally applied or injected. CES: Critical Effect SizeChronic Toxicity: Toxicity (adverse effect) after an exposure period of 12 months or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This latter concern is a general limitation of using animal models to derive human risk assessment endpoints, and it is not specific to any one of the approaches for top dose selection. Rather than a reason to dismiss the use of TK data, such a concern makes it even more critical to take into account any existing TK data collected from shorter-term studies before embarking on the design of longer-term animal studies ( OECD, 2012 ). Also, efforts to understand the TK differences between test species and humans (e.g., comparing in vitro clearance) are necessary to ensure that animal studies provide a rational basis for human health risk assessment ( Lewis and Botham, 2013 ; OECD, 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This latter concern is a general limitation of using animal models to derive human risk assessment endpoints, and it is not specific to any one of the approaches for top dose selection. Rather than a reason to dismiss the use of TK data, such a concern makes it even more critical to take into account any existing TK data collected from shorter-term studies before embarking on the design of longer-term animal studies ( OECD, 2012 ). Also, efforts to understand the TK differences between test species and humans (e.g., comparing in vitro clearance) are necessary to ensure that animal studies provide a rational basis for human health risk assessment ( Lewis and Botham, 2013 ; OECD, 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than a reason to dismiss the use of TK data, such a concern makes it even more critical to take into account any existing TK data collected from shorter-term studies before embarking on the design of longer-term animal studies ( OECD, 2012 ). Also, efforts to understand the TK differences between test species and humans (e.g., comparing in vitro clearance) are necessary to ensure that animal studies provide a rational basis for human health risk assessment ( Lewis and Botham, 2013 ; OECD, 2012 ). In addition to in vivo studies, a range of in vitro and in silico methods are available to characterize both qualitative and quantitative differences in TK across species ( Madden, 2019 ; OECD, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%