2014
DOI: 10.1787/9789264085442-en
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidance Document on the Validation of (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationship [(Q)SAR] Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 A total of six PLS models have been developed. Here, we have used the spline option of the GFA algorithm in order to account for the presence of any non-linear relationship along with the linear variables.…”
Section: Developed Qsar Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…13 A total of six PLS models have been developed. Here, we have used the spline option of the GFA algorithm in order to account for the presence of any non-linear relationship along with the linear variables.…”
Section: Developed Qsar Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 However, the in silico models should be developed in accordance with the guidelines of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 13 Vibrio fischeri (V. fischeri) is a Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacterium, and considered as an important member in a marine ecosystem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[45] The model metrics were further assessed against the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) guidelines for the calibration, internally validated (cross validation) and externally validated models (test set predictions). [26,46] For a dataset with n samples containing observations y 1 to y n , each associated with a predicted/modeled value f 1 to f n wherein y i is a sample within the dataset and f i is its associated predicted/modeled value, SS refers to sum of squares for the estimated (SS E ) and true values (SS T ) and summation is denoted by Σ:…”
Section: Model Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leaving out and model building is continued until target activity/property of all compounds in the training is predicted. It is clear that Q 2 of a model can be lower than R 2 cal but according to the literature, a large difference between R 2 cal and Q 2 (bigger than 0.2-0.3) is a warning about occurrence of over-fitting [592,593]. According to the works of Golbraikh and Tropsha [594], a rule of thumb was proposed as the minimum acceptable criteria: Q 2 > 0.5 and R 2 > 0.…”
Section: Internal Validation By Cross Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%