2015
DOI: 10.1097/xeb.0000000000000050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews

Abstract: Reviews of primary research are becoming more common as evidence-based practice gains recognition as the benchmark for care, and the number of, and access to, primary research sources has grown. One of the newer review types is the 'scoping review'. In general, scoping reviews are commonly used for 'reconnaissance' - to clarify working definitions and conceptual boundaries of a topic or field. Scoping reviews are therefore particularly useful when a body of literature has not yet been comprehensively reviewed,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
3,989
0
152

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4,895 publications
(4,546 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
7
3,989
0
152
Order By: Relevance
“…Scoping studies offers a good alternative since they are used when a literature volume has not yet been extensively reviewed or exhibits a large, complex, or heterogeneous nature that is not amenable to a more accurate systematic review [18,19]. Other designs were not adequate to perform our review [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scoping studies offers a good alternative since they are used when a literature volume has not yet been extensively reviewed or exhibits a large, complex, or heterogeneous nature that is not amenable to a more accurate systematic review [18,19]. Other designs were not adequate to perform our review [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, they are a form of knowledge synthesis that involves mapping existing literature to get a sense of the breadth and depth of a particular research area. 47,[49][50][51] Scoping reviews are typically undertaken to examine the extent, range and nature of the research activity; determine the feasibility of undertaking a full systematic review; summarise and disseminate research findings; and identify gaps in the existing literature. 49 As detailed in the introduction, our review matches the aforementioned given the intention to synthesise what is currently known about the resilience processes of adolescent girls who have experienced CSA.…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scoping review 1 3 involves a systematic procedure: registration of a protocol, defining of inclusion/exclusion criteria, a systematic search on databases, and selection and coding records by two independent reviewers. Specifically, the current study used the guidelines initially proposed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005), which were later clarified and enhanced by further studies (e.g., Levac et al 2010;Daudt et al 2013;Colquhoun et al 2014;Peters et al 2015). The authors worked on this study's protocol during the fall of 2015 and its registration was finalized on December 7, 2015.…”
Section: The Scoping Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its strength is its adaptability to different topics and highly systematic procedure. Even if the scoping methodology originated in clinical research to map knowledge related to interventions, it was successively adopted to map other phenomena of interest, such as research designs, frameworks, theories, or classifications (Peters et al 2015). The scoping review 1 3 involves a systematic procedure: registration of a protocol, defining of inclusion/exclusion criteria, a systematic search on databases, and selection and coding records by two independent reviewers.…”
Section: The Scoping Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%