2012
DOI: 10.17226/22717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidance for the Selection, Use, and Maintenance of Cable Barrier Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• The median guidelines produced under NCHRP Project 22-25 did not address this topic, although the project analyzed hundreds of median configurations (4). An addendum to those guidelines would be appropriate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• The median guidelines produced under NCHRP Project 22-25 did not address this topic, although the project analyzed hundreds of median configurations (4). An addendum to those guidelines would be appropriate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FHWA and NCHRP research on the problem has found that vehicle-to-barrier interface effectiveness is related to lateral placement (1)(2)(3)(4). FHWA research has shown that cable barrier effectiveness is related to its design (e.g., number and height of cables, tensioning), configuration of the median (e.g., shape, width, slopes, depth), and lateral position of the barrier within the median.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Durability and life expectancy requirements for road markings are defined in standards, guidelines and recommendations which are device-specific [2]. The life expectancy of road safety devices depends on the type and durability of manufacturing material [3], and how the devices are used. While this has been researched at length, it is not clear how the conditions of operation (weather, winter road maintenance, occurrence of micro vehicle impacts) affect the life expectancy of road devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Chandler et al 2007) illustrates simply from a visual standpoint the difference between the two types of barrier, with the low-tension on top showing slack, while the bottom image shows high-tension with no slack in the cables. Beyond appearance, the deflection when hit is generally 4' less for high-tension cable than low-tension (Marzougui et al, 2012). The procedure for untangling trapped cars is reportedly less damaging to the barrier system for high-tension barrier when compared with low (Marzougui et al, 2012).…”
Section: Thesis Organizationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Beyond appearance, the deflection when hit is generally 4' less for high-tension cable than low-tension (Marzougui et al, 2012). The procedure for untangling trapped cars is reportedly less damaging to the barrier system for high-tension barrier when compared with low (Marzougui et al, 2012).…”
Section: Thesis Organizationmentioning
confidence: 94%