2020
DOI: 10.17226/25808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidance to Improve Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety at Intersections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are various countermeasures road safety engineers recommend to reduce vehiclepedestrian collisions at signalized intersections. A recent report from the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) collected information from traffic engineering professionals and safety studies to suggest countermeasures suitable for improving pedestrian and bicycle safety (Sanders et al, 2020). Examples of these were leading pedestrian intervals (LPIs) and fully protected vehicular left-turns (FPLT).…”
Section: List Of Figuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are various countermeasures road safety engineers recommend to reduce vehiclepedestrian collisions at signalized intersections. A recent report from the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) collected information from traffic engineering professionals and safety studies to suggest countermeasures suitable for improving pedestrian and bicycle safety (Sanders et al, 2020). Examples of these were leading pedestrian intervals (LPIs) and fully protected vehicular left-turns (FPLT).…”
Section: List Of Figuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various transportation professionals recommend using protected left-turn signal phasing to improve pedestrian safety and left-turning collisions at intersections because of the limited geometry change and cost required to implement this signal phasing (Sanders et al, 2020). Changes from permissive-protected to protected left-turn phasing resulted in CMFs from 0.0 to 0.01 (Srinivasan et al, 2008) when looking at left-turn collisions between vehicle-vehicle and vehiclepedestrian collisions, while changes from permissive to protected-permissive phasing resulted in CMFs from 0.787 to 1.136 (Srinivasan et al, 2008) (Goughnour et al, 2021).…”
Section: Fully Protected Left-turn Safety Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are various countermeasures road safety engineers recommend to reduce vehiclepedestrian collisions at signalized intersections. A recent report from the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) collected information from traffic engineering professionals and safety studies to suggest countermeasures suitable for improving pedestrian and bicycle safety (Sanders et al, 2020). Examples of these were leading pedestrian intervals (LPIs) and fully protected vehicular left-turns (FPLT).…”
Section: List Of Figuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various transportation professionals recommend using protected left-turn signal phasing to improve pedestrian safety and left-turning collisions at intersections because of the limited geometry change and cost required to implement this signal phasing (Sanders et al, 2020). Changes from permissive-protected to protected left-turn phasing resulted in CMFs from 0.0 to 0.01 (Srinivasan et al, 2008) when looking at left-turn collisions between vehicle-vehicle and vehiclepedestrian collisions, while changes from permissive to protected-permissive phasing resulted in CMFs from 0.787 to 1.136 (Srinivasan et al, 2008) (Goughnour et al, 2021).…”
Section: Fully Protected Left-turn Safety Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%