Background
Soft tissue stability is crucial to obtain and maintain optimal esthetic results.
Purpose
This study aimed to investigate, over 5 years, the soft tissue response using a conical abutment together with the “one‐abutment one‐time” (OA‐OT) protocol in the restoration of implants inserted in the anterior esthetic area.
Material and Methods
From January 2011 to January 2012, all consecutive patients requiring an implant n the maxillary area between canines were enrolled. After submerged healing and osseointegration, a definitive abutment with a provisional crown was inserted. After 1 month, the definitive crown was delivered (Tdef). Analog impressions were taken before tooth extraction (T0), at implant insertion Timpl, and Tdef, and at 12 months (T1) and 60 months (T5). Casts were scanned and superimposed using a dedicated software. Differences in vertical height of soft tissue margins between the digitized model casts were calculated and paired sample t test was conducted to compare results. To detect the potential role of biotype, groups (thick vs. thin) were compared by analysis of variance with general linear model.
Results
Twenty‐five patients were enrolled. Three patients dropped out. At the 60‐month, 22 patients (12 men and 10 women with mean age of 68.3 ± 11 years) concluded the study follow‐up. Horizontal changes demonstrated gain of 1.06 mm at Timpl, 0.94 mm at Tdef, 0.92 mm at T1 and 0.97 mm at T5 compared to T0. Vertical changes demonstrated gain of 0.84 mm at Timpl, 0.11 mm at Tdef, 0.29 mm at T1 and 0.59 mm at T5 compared to T0. The analysis of variance showed a significant better performance of thick biotype in soft tissue horizontal width (P = .022). No statistical differences were noticed for vertical width (P = .111).
Conclusions
The use of a conical abutment together with the OA‐OT approach allowed longitudinal stable soft tissue dimensions.