2018 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Virtual Environments for Measurement Systems and Applicati 2018
DOI: 10.1109/civemsa.2018.8440000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guided Learning of Pronunciation by Visualizing Tongue Articulation in Ultrasound Image Sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond speech therapy, ultrasound is used in phonetics research to compare tongue-shapes for different phones (Davidson, 2006;Lee-Kim et al, 2014;Chen & Lin, 2011;Lawson et al, 2015;Ahn, 2018), or to gain insight into speech production through articulatory-to-acoustic or acoustic-to-articulatory mapping (Hueber et al, 2011;Porras et al, 2019). Ultrasound is also used for practical tasks such as second language learning and acquisition (Wilson et al, 2006;Gick et al, 2008;Mozaffari et al, 2018), or to drive silent speech interfaces, which can be used to restore spoken communication for users with voice impairments (Denby & Stone, 2004;Hueber et al, 2010;Csapó et al, 2017;Ji et al, 2018;Ribeiro et al, 2021b).…”
Section: Ultrasound Tongue Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond speech therapy, ultrasound is used in phonetics research to compare tongue-shapes for different phones (Davidson, 2006;Lee-Kim et al, 2014;Chen & Lin, 2011;Lawson et al, 2015;Ahn, 2018), or to gain insight into speech production through articulatory-to-acoustic or acoustic-to-articulatory mapping (Hueber et al, 2011;Porras et al, 2019). Ultrasound is also used for practical tasks such as second language learning and acquisition (Wilson et al, 2006;Gick et al, 2008;Mozaffari et al, 2018), or to drive silent speech interfaces, which can be used to restore spoken communication for users with voice impairments (Denby & Stone, 2004;Hueber et al, 2010;Csapó et al, 2017;Ji et al, 2018;Ribeiro et al, 2021b).…”
Section: Ultrasound Tongue Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is crucial to have a fully automatic system for the tongue contour extraction. It is even harder for the case of tongue contour tracking in real-time applications (Mozaffari et al, 2018). Various methods have been utilized for the problem of automatic tongue extraction in the last recent years such as image segmentation like active contour models or snakes (Ghrenassia et al, 2014;Laporte and Ménard, 2015;Li et al, 2005;Xu et al, 2016bXu et al, , 2016c, graph-based technique (Tang and Hamarneh, 2010), machine learning-based methods (Berry and Fasel, 2011;Fabre et al, 2015;Fasel and Berry, 2010;L.…”
Section: Literature Review and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposing two robust, accurate, fully-automatic deep learning architectures specifically for tongue contour extraction while the proposed models have the capability of real-time performance using GPU power. An alternative solution for CPU only purposes has been reported in previous research (Mozaffari et al, 2018). For the first time, dilated convolution is combined with the standard deep, dense classification method in two new network architectures to extract both local and global context from each frame at the same time in an end-to-end fashion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…End-to-end fashion supervised deep learning techniques, outperformed previous techniques in recent years. For example, U-net [12] has been used for automatic ultrasound tongue extraction [18], [9]. After successful results of deep learning methods, the focus of advanced techniques for tongue contour extraction is more on generalization and real-time performance [5], [10], [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%