Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSOFT International SPIN Symposium on Model Checking of Software 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3092282.3092298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guided test case generation for mobile apps in the TRIANGLE project: work in progress

Abstract: The evolution of mobile networks and the increasing number of scenarios for mobile applications requires new approaches to ensure their quality and performance. The TRIANGLE project aims to develop an integrated testing framework that allows the evaluation of applications and devices in different network scenarios. This paper focuses on the generation of user interactions that will be part of the test cases for applications. We propose a method that combines model-based testing and guided search, based on the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our future work, we will also add the communication time between processes to the model, as well as consider other settings, in particular, the number of work items. In addition, to improve our counterexample method, we are going to try using the never claim pruning from [30], and finding optimal values from [11], which avoids multiple runs of the SPIN verifier in the counterexample method. We also plan to improve the scalability of our counterexample method by modeling a warp-based scheduling [31], because due to warping, the number of simultaneously working processing elements becomes smaller, which implies reduction of interleaving non-determinism in the model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our future work, we will also add the communication time between processes to the model, as well as consider other settings, in particular, the number of work items. In addition, to improve our counterexample method, we are going to try using the never claim pruning from [30], and finding optimal values from [11], which avoids multiple runs of the SPIN verifier in the counterexample method. We also plan to improve the scalability of our counterexample method by modeling a warp-based scheduling [31], because due to warping, the number of simultaneously working processing elements becomes smaller, which implies reduction of interleaving non-determinism in the model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%