1997
DOI: 10.1902/jop.1997.68.6.571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guided Tissue Regeneration Therapy of 203 Consecutively Treated Intrabony Defects Using a Bioabsorbable Matrix Barrier. Clinical and Radiographic Findings

Abstract: THE AIM OF THIS RETROSPECTIVE three-center study was to evaluate guided tissue regeneration (GTR) therapy in a clinical periodontal setting. The material consisted of 203 consecutively treated intrabony defects > or = 4 mm in 143 patients using a bioabsorbable matrix barrier. Each center followed the same protocol for presurgical, intrasurgical, and follow up examinations. Initial therapy, surgical, and follow-up treatments followed the routine of each center. Treatment was evaluated after 1 year by clinical a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

13
85
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
13
85
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean distance measured from CEJ to base of defect from the radiographs (8.78 ± 2.48 mm for APC sites; 7.34 ± 1.59 mm for control sites) was less than that measured at surgery (9.2 ± 2.86 mm for test sites; 8 ± 1.58 mm for MEM sites) (Table 2). A similar discrepancy of ∼1 mm between direct clinical measurement and measurement from radiographs also was reported by Falk et al 23 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The mean distance measured from CEJ to base of defect from the radiographs (8.78 ± 2.48 mm for APC sites; 7.34 ± 1.59 mm for control sites) was less than that measured at surgery (9.2 ± 2.86 mm for test sites; 8 ± 1.58 mm for MEM sites) (Table 2). A similar discrepancy of ∼1 mm between direct clinical measurement and measurement from radiographs also was reported by Falk et al 23 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The mean changes were averaged between the outcomes at the buccal and lingual sides of the defects n numbers of defects influence the ΔCAL and ΔPPD following GTR therapy [40][41][42]. The GTR sites of the present study had an average baseline PPD of 6.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although these clinical changes were statistically significant between baseline and final measurements within the groups, no statistically significant differences were found between the test and control groups [Table 1]. Cortellini[17] and Falk[18] et al . have reported greater gain in the clinical attachment level after GTR; however, these authors were dealing with deeper initial intrabony defects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%