Guidelines, compliance, and effectiveness: a 12 months’ audit in an acute district general healthcare trust on the two week rule for suspected colorectal cancer

Abstract

Objectives The Department of Health had recently introduced guidelines so that all suspected colorectal cancer patients could be seen by a specialist within two weeks of referral by their general practitioners. The usefulness and practicality of such a decision had been questioned. The aims of this study were to measure the compliance to the guidelines and evaluate the effectiveness of such referrals. Methods All patients who were referred to the rapid access colorectal clinic between August 2000 and July 2001 were included. Settings Darlington Memorial Hospital and Bishop Auckland General Hospital, both under South Durham Health Care Trust, were considered for the study. Measures Date of referral, referring practitioner, time of appointment, reasons for referral, and diagnosis. Results A total of 239 referrals were made; 96.2% of patients were given appointments within two weeks. Rectal bleed was the commonest (32%) cause for referral. Diverticular disease was the most frequent (29%) condition diagnosed. Altogether 97.4% of referrals were incomplete and 37.6% did not comply with the guidelines. Twenty one colorectal cancers (8.9%) were diagnosed. The early cancer detection rate was 4.6%. Conclusions This audit showed that compliance to the guidelines was associated with a higher cancer detection rate. The majority of patients received appointments within two weeks. Contrary to some speculations, the number of referrals was not limitless. However a high number of referrals failed to adhere to the guidelines. The cancer (particularly early cancer) detection rate was disappointingly low. This does not reflect an efficient system of referral and potential benefits to patients remain questionable.

Prospective Evaluation of a Novel One-Stop Testicular Clinic

“…4 Fifty-three patients were referred under the '2-week wait' rule, of whom 9(17%) had testicular cancer.Fourteen cancers in total were diagnosed in this period of which 3 were referred as 'soon' or 'routine' resulting in ad elay to diagnosis of 56-75 days. Increasing inappropriate referrals under a' 2-week wait' banner reduce service capacity for those who genuinely need to be seen urgently.I nt heir study,Foster et al 5,6 Removing diagnostic uncertainty by allowing open access to ao nestop service reduces delay for all patients and, in doing so, prevents the delay in management of testicular tumour masquerading as benign scrotal disease. This is one of the principles set out in the Department of Health Modernisation Agency document, TenH igh Impact Changes.…”

Influences on pre-hospital delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review

“…In addition, some patients identified practitioners as gatekeepers and a potential barrier to their referral since the patient waited for the GP to act on their behalf (Bain et al, 2002). Although limited, there is some evidence to suggest that appropriate referral and use of referral guidelines is associated with reduced delay (Holliday and Hardcastle, 1979;Debnath et al, 2002;Eccersley et al, 2003). Practitioners in rural areas were less likely to refer, due to the distance from specialist services (Sladden and Thomson, 1998) (Table 2).…”

The Interface of Primary and Oncology Specialty Care: From Symptoms to Diagnosis

“…One potential approach to improve the evaluation process is to implement diagnostic practice guidelines. Many guidelines exist to assist clinicians how to evaluate symptoms, who should be tested, and what tests to order (38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44). Conceptual tools for development of new guidelines (45) and processes to achieve consensus on guidelines have been described (46,47).…”