2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines for a cancer prevention smartphone application: A mixed-methods study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A qualitative research design and focus group methodology were chosen to collect user needs and preferences for the content and features of bWell [ 58 , 59 ]. Focus groups allow for experiences and multiple views to be shared and discussed, and allow for consensus on a topic to be explored [ 60 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A qualitative research design and focus group methodology were chosen to collect user needs and preferences for the content and features of bWell [ 58 , 59 ]. Focus groups allow for experiences and multiple views to be shared and discussed, and allow for consensus on a topic to be explored [ 60 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vandelanotte et al [7] categorize eHealth and mHealth as the internet, mobile devices, and smartphone and mobile phone applications (apps) [8]. Among these technologies, smartphone and mobile phone apps are particularly attractive because they are widely adopted, people are strongly attached to them, and they exhibit powerful technical capabilities [9,10]. Apps also hold the promise of producing behavior change and have been used, for instance, to assist patients with cancer increase their PA [11].…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study of Ribeiro et al (2016), the inverse process is performed, where a survey with users explores their views and experiences, gathering information to verify what are their expectations and features regarding a cancer prevention application that seeks behavior change. The obtained results are transformed into guidelines used for the elaboration of m-Health apps.…”
Section: Studies Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only one participant had previously used MAR technology. The studies of Harpur and Villiers (2015) and Ribeiro et al (2016) had more than one evaluation phase, with different groups of users in each of them. In the first one, the research was conducted over two and a half years and involved four subsequent evaluations, each by two different methods, between two types of participants: expert evaluators and students.…”
Section: Research Question 2: How Is the User Experience Evaluated Inmentioning
confidence: 99%