2012
DOI: 10.1037/a0025892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines for assessment of and intervention with persons with disabilities.

Abstract: Although many persons who have disabilities have experienced discrimination, each individual reacts differently to those experiences. Moreover, each person assigns a unique meaning to disability, depending on the nature of impairment, the quality of social support, and life demands (Olkin, 1999b;Olkin & Taliaferro, 2005;Vash & Crewe, 2004). Above and beyond their disability experiences, persons with disabilities have their own life experiences and, like everyone else, their own personal characteristics, histor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within psychological disciplines, the experiences of individuals with disabilities are often misunderstood and underrepresented (American Psychological Association, 2012; Keller & Galgay, 2010; Prilleltensky & Prilleltensky, 2003). In fact, it is only recently that conceptualizations of disability have begun to move away from a medical model (i.e., equating disability with a personal defect that must be fixed) and toward an identity model (i.e., cultural and/or minority identity embedded in systems of oppression) that encompasses a wide range of differences that fall outside sociocultural norms of what is deemed to be “able” (Siebers, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within psychological disciplines, the experiences of individuals with disabilities are often misunderstood and underrepresented (American Psychological Association, 2012; Keller & Galgay, 2010; Prilleltensky & Prilleltensky, 2003). In fact, it is only recently that conceptualizations of disability have begun to move away from a medical model (i.e., equating disability with a personal defect that must be fixed) and toward an identity model (i.e., cultural and/or minority identity embedded in systems of oppression) that encompasses a wide range of differences that fall outside sociocultural norms of what is deemed to be “able” (Siebers, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we considered the possibility that nonadherence reflects inadequate training or supervision of examiners, we dedicated far more attention to this issue than is typical. Instead, we believe that nonadherence reflects the limited experience that most test administrators have in ensuring that all participants had an “unobstructed opportunity to demonstrate their standing on the construct being measured.” Adherence to APA Guidelines for Assessment of and Intervention with Persons with Disabilities (APA, 2012) requires content knowledge, experience, and judgement to inform decisions, which some research assistants and test administrators lack. Most test instructions do not include procedures for reasonable accommodations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some accommodations may breach standardization, “for many kinds of tests, an accommodated measure would yield more valid results than the same measure without such accommodations” (APA, 2012, p. 53). When tests and administration protocols are modified, new normative information must be collected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, clinicians need to have an adequate level of education and degree which may be, for instance, a Master’s degree in an appropriate major (e.g., psychology; special education) [38]. They should pass an examination for licensing, and be required to attend continuing education to update skills and knowledge [39]. In 2017, the New York State of Department of Health (United States) published a clinical practice guideline to ensure that “early intervention programs provide consistent, high-quality, cost-effective, and appropriate services that result in measurable outcomes for eligible children and their families” [40].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%