“…For instance, there is a potential for these tests to renew the outdated perception that "race" is a useful description of genetic variation (Cornell & Hartmann, 2006) and to impact policy decisions such as those around identity-based claims to citizenship (Rose & Novas, 2005), tribal membership (TallBear, 2013) or, even, affirmative action eligibility. In turn, in line with previous suggestions (see Wagner et al, 2023), it is important to remember that genetic ancestry is not definitive, that inferences continue to evolve and that nongenetic evidence should simultaneously be considered whenever possible (e.g., cultural connections). In addition to continuing to build and disseminate interventions aimed at genetic literacy (see Donovan et al, 2021), we urge DNA ancestry testing companies and the media to indicate just how much DNA is shared between any two humans (for a review, see Templeton, 2013, also see Rosenberg et al, 2002), to emphasize the additional limitations of these tests (see Bolnick et al, 2007; S. S. J.…”