2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9585-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines for improving the stringency of response shift research using the thentest

Abstract: The guidelines-checklist has the potential to stimulate rigorous and replicable research using the thentest. This checklist might also be of use for journal editors and reviewers as 'gate keepers' of stringent research. Many of these suggestions also apply to other methods of detecting response shift.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
100
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
100
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Estos efectos reducen notablemente el riesgo de caída y favorecen la autonomía y la socialización de la persona mayor. Este factor correlaciona con la mejora de la dimensión funcional de la CdV (Schwartz, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Estos efectos reducen notablemente el riesgo de caída y favorecen la autonomía y la socialización de la persona mayor. Este factor correlaciona con la mejora de la dimensión funcional de la CdV (Schwartz, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Metzoff (1981a) identifies the two methods of measuring training effectiveness; the participant self-report questionnaire, and the behavioral observation measure. Using the traditional pre/post method for self-report assessments has long been considered the least effective and reliable method of measuring training outcomes because 1) on the pre-assessment participants may have limited knowledge of the construct being measured and therefore do not have the reference to adequately assess their prior knowledge, and 2) they tend to underestimate training benefits (Drennan & Hyde, 2008;Metzoff, 1981a;Rockwell & Kohn, 1989;Schwartz & Sprangers, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tendency for the participant to redefine his/her frame of reference after training, called response-shift bias, has been found in numerous studies using pre and post assessments in a variety of training situations, and causes pretest-posttest comparisons to be inaccurate (Blome & Augistin, 2016;Davis, 2002;Drennan & Hyde, 2008;Howard, 1980;Metzoff, 1981b;Schwartz & Sprangers, 2010;Umble, Upshaw, Orton, & Matthews, 2000). Response-shift bias means that the participant has shifted his/her internal definition of the criteria by which to judge the appropriate rating of an item because the training has impacted his/her frame of reference (Blome & Augustin, 2016;Davis, 2002;Drennan & Hyde, 2008;Howard, 1980;Metzoff, 1981b;Schwartz & Sprangers, 2010;Umble et al, 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Originating from work in educational and management sciences research, this approach gained popularity because it was easy to implement and easy to analyze. However, a number of researchers have documented that the then-test is confounded with recall bias [7,8] and reflects a number of cognitive processes in addition to recalibration response shift effects [9,10]. TamineauBloem et al [11] conducted qualitative studies and used cognitive interviewing to examine whether two key assumptions of the then-test approach are valid.…”
Section: Item-level Study Using the Then-testmentioning
confidence: 99%