Guidelines for obstetrical scanning and reporting: the legal necessity.

Bundy, Allen; Jones, Tom

doi:10.7863/jum.1985.4.9.483

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Discussion1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1989

2021

Publication Types

Select...

Article4

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent4

Authors

Journals

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Standard views should be recorded [11]. Evidence of hydrocephaly can be seen on a t7 week exam, while absent on a 15 week exam.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fetal sonography

et al. 1989

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Standard views should be recorded [11]. Evidence of hydrocephaly can be seen on a t7 week exam, while absent on a 15 week exam.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fetal sonography

et al. 1989

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Standard views should be recorded [11]. It seems therefore appropriate to recommand that the "routine" obstetrical sonogram be performed at 18-20 weeks of pregnancy and not earlier.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

On the preceding paper by L. Garel, J. Boisvert, D. Filiatrault, A. Grignon, G. Perreault and H. Patriquin: Fetal sonography. I. Neural tube defects

Berdon

1989

Pediatr Radiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It seemed appropriate to use the talents of Dr. Garel and colleagues, pediatric radiologists who perform" a large number of obstretrical sonographic studies at Hopital Sainte Justine in Montreal.The following invited presentation is a clear and pragmatic discussion of a large series in one Institution and hopefully it will be followed later by similar results of pre-natal bone dysptasia sonographic studies, gastrointestinal and genitourinary diagnoses as well.

show abstract

“…Clinicians now rely heavily on sonogmaphy to assess fetal growth and development. The link of new technology (sonogmaphy) and a high-risk specialty (obstetrics) has increased the potential for significant liability [1,2]. The Roe v. Wade decision has added further import to obstetric sonogmaphy.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%