1998
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-129-5-199809010-00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines for the Clinical Diagnosis of Lyme Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, such tests are prone to misdiagnosis of Lyme disease, despite the introduction of a two‐step protocol including a second test (Western blot) to confirm a positive or indeterminate enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or immunofluorescence assay [4,5]. In particular, false‐negative ELISA results may be recorded in patients with a diagnostic Western blot, thus limiting the validity of this assay format [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, such tests are prone to misdiagnosis of Lyme disease, despite the introduction of a two‐step protocol including a second test (Western blot) to confirm a positive or indeterminate enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or immunofluorescence assay [4,5]. In particular, false‐negative ELISA results may be recorded in patients with a diagnostic Western blot, thus limiting the validity of this assay format [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%