2022
DOI: 10.1111/bju.15883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines of guidelines: focal therapy for prostate cancer, is it time for consensus?

Abstract: To provide a summary and discussion of international guidelines, position statements and consensus statements in relation to focal therapy (FT) for prostate cancer (PCa).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Absence of csPCa on 18‐month MRGB was considered an intermediate‐term success, after which patients were included in an ongoing active surveillance program described previously. Small amounts of GG1 (<6 mm) were not considered csPCa 22,23 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Absence of csPCa on 18‐month MRGB was considered an intermediate‐term success, after which patients were included in an ongoing active surveillance program described previously. Small amounts of GG1 (<6 mm) were not considered csPCa 22,23 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small amounts of GG1 (<6 mm) were not considered csPCa. 22,23 Patients found to have csPCa on either follow-up biopsy were considered to have reached a study endpoint at which time the men underwent surgery, radiation, repeat PGA, 24 or expectant management (Figure 1). Serum PSA levels were obtained at baseline and throughout the follow-up period.…”
Section: Lay Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, a Gleason score of 4 + 3 or less was considered the main indication for treatment, while a score of 4 + 4 with diameters of 10 mm or less were indicated for treatment based on the patient’s general condition. In a previous review of the consensus of inclusion criteria for focal therapy, almost all studies agreed that focal therapy should be reserved for men with a Gleason score less than 4 + 3; however, selected statements did not reach a consensus in patients with a Gleason score of 4 + 4 [ 16 ]. Therefore, the present inclusion criteria were similar to those of other clinical studies on focal therapy, and the present results are expected to be adapted for other clinical studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decade, at least 10 consensuses on FT have been published, covering a range of topics such as definitions, patient selection, biomarker use, and follow-up protocols [ 51 ]. However, many of these consensuses had relatively small respondent pools, with less than 100 people participating, and a majority of these respondents being urologists and experts on the field.…”
Section: Consensus As a Strong Movement To Unify Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%