ObjectivesTo determine the influence of lowering iodinated contrast concentration on confidence of interventional radiologists in diagnosing and treating lesions during endovascular interventions in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD).MethodsA randomized controlled non-inferiority trial was performed in 60 patients. Intervention was performed with contrast concentrations (in mg of iodine per mL, mgI/mL) of 300 (standard), 240, or 140 mgI/mL. Primary outcome was confidence (score 0-100 %) of radiologists in diagnosing and treating arterial lesions. Secondary outcomes were procedural iodine load and image quality (i.e. non-diagnostic, limited, diagnostic, exemplary).ResultsMedian confidence scores in diagnosing lesions were 100 % (range 81-100 %) for the 300 group (n = 21), 100 % (range 82-100 %) for the 240 group (n = 19), and 100 % (range 91-100 %) for the 140 group (n = 20) (both p = 1.00 compared to the 300 group). Median scores for treating lesions in the 240 and 140 groups, 100 % (range 79-100 %, p = 0.40), and 100 % (range 63-100 %, p = 0.25), respectively, were not lower compared to the 300 group (median 100 %, range 78-100 %). Procedural iodine load was lower in the 240 (24.3 ± 7.6 g, p = 0.022) and 140 groups (17.8 ± 5.6 g, p < 0.001) compared to the 300 group (29.7 ± 6.3 g). Image quality was diagnostic for all groups.ConclusionUsing iodine contrast of 140 mgI/mL for diagnosis and interventions in PAD patients significantly reduces administered iodine load without compromising image quality. Future use of lower iodine dose is recommended.Key Points• Lower iodinated contrast concentration during endovascular intervention does not decrease radiologist’s confidence.• Image quality of standardized angiographies remains diagnostic using 140 mgI/mL iodinated contrast concentration.• Iodine load during intervention can be decreased by >40 % when using 140 mgI/mL.• Implementing the use of a lower iodinated contrast concentration will reduce the costs of the procedure.