2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2023.109158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines to use input contact parameters for nonlinear dynamic analysis of jointed structures: Results of a round robin test

Alfredo Fantetti,
Daniele Botto,
Stefano Zucca
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from this round robin provides hence a unique comparison of measurements, taken from two different rigs on specimens manufactured from the same batch of stainless steel. The factors that may cause differences in the measurements from the different test rigs have been instead discussed in detail in the related research article [1] . This data will particularly benefit researchers in the fields of joint mechanics, nonlinear dynamics, tribology and contact mechanics, who need to quantify contact parameters for their applications.…”
Section: Value Of the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Data from this round robin provides hence a unique comparison of measurements, taken from two different rigs on specimens manufactured from the same batch of stainless steel. The factors that may cause differences in the measurements from the different test rigs have been instead discussed in detail in the related research article [1] . This data will particularly benefit researchers in the fields of joint mechanics, nonlinear dynamics, tribology and contact mechanics, who need to quantify contact parameters for their applications.…”
Section: Value Of the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from this round robin provides hence a unique comparison of measurements, taken from two different rigs on specimens manufactured from the same batch of stainless steel. The factors that may cause differences in the measurements from the different test rigs have been instead discussed in detail in the related research article [1] .…”
Section: Value Of the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations