Precise radiation therapy (RT) for abdominal lesions is complicated by respiratory motion and suboptimal soft tissue contrast in 4D CT. 4D MRI offers improved contrast although long scan times and irregular breathing patterns can be limiting. To address this, visual biofeedback (VBF) was introduced into 4D MRI. Ten volunteers were consented to an IRBâapproved protocol. Prospective respiratoryâtriggered, T2âweighted, coronal 4D MRIs were acquired on an open 1.0T MRâSIM. VBF was integrated using an MRâcompatible interactive breathâhold control system. Subjects visually monitored their breathing patterns to stay within predetermined tolerances. 4D MRIs were acquired with and without VBF for 2â and 8âphase acquisitions. Normalized respiratory waveforms were evaluated for scan time, duty cycle (programmed/acquisition time), breathing period, and breathing regularity (endâinhale coefficient of variation, EIâCOV). Three reviewers performed image quality assessment to compare artifacts with and without VBF. Respirationâinduced liver motion was calculated via centroid difference analysis of endâexhale (EE) and EI liver contours. Incorporating VBF reduced 2âphase acquisition time (4.7±1.0 and 5.4±1.5trueprefixmin with and without VBF, respectively) while reducing EIâCOV by 43.8%±16.6%. For 8âphase acquisitions, VBF reduced acquisition time by 1.9±1.6trueprefixmin and EIâCOVs by 38.8%±25.7% despite breathing rate remaining similar (11.1±3.8 breaths/min with vs. 10.5±2.9 without). Using VBF yielded higher duty cycles than unguided free breathing (34.4%±5.8% vs. 28.1%±6.6%, respectively). Image grading showed that out of 40 paired evaluations, 20 cases had equivalent and 17 had improved image quality scores with VBF, particularly for midâexhale and EI. Increased liver excursion was observed with VBF, where superiorâinferior, anteriorâposterior, and leftâright EEâEI displacements were 14.1±5.8, 4.9±2.1, and 1.5±1.0âmm, respectively, with VBF compared to 11.9±4.5, 3.7±2.1, and 1.2±1.4âmm without. Incorporating VBF into 4D MRI substantially reduced acquisition time, breathing irregularity, and image artifacts. However, differences in excursion were observed, thus implementation will be required throughout the RT workflow.PACS number(s): 87.55.âx, 87.61.âc, 87.19.xj