2010
DOI: 10.1177/0273475309360161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guiding Reflective Practice: An Auditing Framework to Assess Teaching Philosophy and Style

Abstract: Growing as an educator takes hard work and commitment. It requires the educator to engage in regular, objective selfexaminations of instructional beliefs and behaviors. Although this task can be daunting, and unwieldy, due to the complexity of the teaching-learning exchange, it can also be undertaken in a systematic manner. This article proposes a framework of five elements that appear essential for assessing instructor beliefs and behaviors: content, learner, educator, social setting, and physical environment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
2
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A range of benefits flow from SoTL to faculty, students and the institution: For instance, it leads to more reflective and informed teaching practice and renews faculty's enthusiasm for teaching; student learning is enhanced through development of innovative teaching methods and attention to outcomes; the institution's reputation is strengthened ( Hubball and Clarke, 2010;Iowa State University, 2001) . SoTL is also consistent with a range of pedagogical concepts raised in recent marketing education literature, such as master teaching ( Smart et al, 2003 ), the principle of servant teachers as stewards of the teaching and learning environment ( Chonko, 2007 ), metacognition and transfer ( Ramocki, 2007 ), pedagogical competence ( Madhavaram and Laverie, 2010 ) and conscientious reflective practice to grow as an educator ( Titus and Gremler, 2010 ).…”
Section: What Is Sotl?supporting
confidence: 81%
“…A range of benefits flow from SoTL to faculty, students and the institution: For instance, it leads to more reflective and informed teaching practice and renews faculty's enthusiasm for teaching; student learning is enhanced through development of innovative teaching methods and attention to outcomes; the institution's reputation is strengthened ( Hubball and Clarke, 2010;Iowa State University, 2001) . SoTL is also consistent with a range of pedagogical concepts raised in recent marketing education literature, such as master teaching ( Smart et al, 2003 ), the principle of servant teachers as stewards of the teaching and learning environment ( Chonko, 2007 ), metacognition and transfer ( Ramocki, 2007 ), pedagogical competence ( Madhavaram and Laverie, 2010 ) and conscientious reflective practice to grow as an educator ( Titus and Gremler, 2010 ).…”
Section: What Is Sotl?supporting
confidence: 81%
“…With music teaching occurring in schools, the private instrumental teaching studio, and in a range of community settings, but bearing in mind visual impairment is a relatively low incidence Special Educational Need, all this also raises questions about the training and awareness needed by, say, music degree students who, as part of a "portfolio career" (Bennett, 2008), may well teach; not to mention those who are training to become specialist music teachers. Perhaps awareness can be raised in "reflective practice" exercises by in-service and future music educators (on "reflective practice" read: Schön, 1983Schön, , 1987Loughran, 2002;Titus & Gremler, 2010;Burwell, 2012). In relation not only to visual impairment but "disability", or "different abilities" in general, this could take music undergraduates in conservatoires and university music departments along a critical chain from the "insider" views of the differently-abled to the autonomous development of practice; that is, teaching of which they have very deep understanding and considerable ownership.…”
Section: Concluding Thoughtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet we should bear in mind, here, that visual impairment has a relatively low incidence. Perhaps awareness can be raised in "reflective practice" exercises by inservice and future music educators (on "reflective practice" read: Burwell, 2012;Loughran, 2002;Schön, 1983Schön, , 1987Titus & Gremler, 2010). In relation not only to visual impairment but "disability", or "different abilities" in general, this could take music undergraduates in conservatoires and university music departments along a critical chain from the "insider" views of the differently-abled to the autonomous development of practice; that is, teaching of which they have very deep understanding and considerable ownership.…”
Section: Concluding Thoughtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En contraste, Schaefer y Zygmont (2003) concluyeron que los estilos más tradicionales, centrados en el profesor, no favorecen un buen clima. No obstante, se debe tomar en cuenta que no existe un estilo de enseñanza puro, sino combinaciones, o un estilo predominante que se combinan con otros estilos secundarios (Titus y Gremler, 2010).…”
Section: Creencias Docentes Estilo De Enseñanza Y Manejo De La Disciplinaunclassified