2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2019.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guiding the Refinement of Biochemical Knowledgebases with Ensembles of Metabolic Networks and Machine Learning

Abstract: Guiding the Refinement of Biochemical Knowledgebases with Ensembles of Metabolic Networks and Machine Learning Highlights d Prioritizing curation of complex mechanistic models is challenging d Development of curation guidance approach for genomescale metabolic models d Ensembles and machine learning are used to prioritize possible curation efforts d Application to metabolic models for 29 bacterial species and a biochemical database

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To build these semi-curated reconstructions, we transformed the manually-curated reconstruction using genetic orthology ( Figure 2A , step 3 ) and added all transformed reactions to the recipient de novo reconstruction ( Figure 2A , step 4 ). Lastly, all draft and semi-curated reconstructions were gapfilled using parsimonious flux balance analysis (pFBA)-based gapfilling (Biggs and Papin 2017; Medlock and Papin 2018) to complete biochemical requirements identified in the experimental literature ( Figure 2A , step 5 ) and to produce biomass (see the Supplemental Methods ). As a result, when compared to manually-curated parasite reconstructions (Carey, Papin, and Guler 2017; Abdel-Haleem et al 2018; Chiappino-Pepe et al 2017; Tymoshenko et al 2015), semi-curated reconstructions are larger in scope than de novo reconstructions and generate predictions with comparable accuracy ( Figure 2C-D ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To build these semi-curated reconstructions, we transformed the manually-curated reconstruction using genetic orthology ( Figure 2A , step 3 ) and added all transformed reactions to the recipient de novo reconstruction ( Figure 2A , step 4 ). Lastly, all draft and semi-curated reconstructions were gapfilled using parsimonious flux balance analysis (pFBA)-based gapfilling (Biggs and Papin 2017; Medlock and Papin 2018) to complete biochemical requirements identified in the experimental literature ( Figure 2A , step 5 ) and to produce biomass (see the Supplemental Methods ). As a result, when compared to manually-curated parasite reconstructions (Carey, Papin, and Guler 2017; Abdel-Haleem et al 2018; Chiappino-Pepe et al 2017; Tymoshenko et al 2015), semi-curated reconstructions are larger in scope than de novo reconstructions and generate predictions with comparable accuracy ( Figure 2C-D ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To gapfill for individual metabolites or biomass (next section), we used a parsimonious flux balance analysis (pFBA)-based approach as originally used in Biggs and Papin (2017) and futher developed in Medlock and Papin (2018). Code is linked in the Supplemental Information.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A) Ensemble FBA performed on glucose or mannose minimal media using an ensemble of 1000 GEMs for Staphylococcus aureus. This ensemble was generated in [6] by iteratively gapfilling a draft reconstruction to enable biomass production in single-carbon source growth conditions supported with experimental data. Mean for the distribution for either condition shown by vertical line of same color.…”
Section: Coupling Ensemble Modeling With Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medusa implements a previously-developed algorithm for gapfilling GENREs using growth phenotyping data [6,19]. The algorithm takes a GENRE with an objective function and a dataset of binary growth/no-growth calls on defined media conditions as input.…”
Section: Generating Ensembles From Phenotypic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation