“…For a causal assessment of "possible" using these modified criteria, known causes that were more likely associated with the event needed to have been excluded. Therefore, if an upper respiratory or gastrointestinal illness was reported in the 4 weeks preceding GBS symptom onset, both associated with GBS in the literature [16], the case would not be causally assessed as "possibly" related to vaccine (and therefore would be classified as either "unlikely" or "unrelated") since the preceding illness represented a "more likely" cause of the adverse event [17][18] (Figure 1). In reports with laboratory evidence of a co-existent infection, the working group did not assess these cases as causally "unrelated" to vaccine, but rather "unlikely", since it was not certain that the co-existent infection caused the adverse event.…”