2007
DOI: 10.1002/bdm.572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guilty, not guilty, or …? multiple options in jury verdict choices

Abstract: Three studies investigate the role and impact of alternative verdicts to the conventional choice between conviction and acquittal. The primary focus is on the Not Proven option, with a lesser charge alternative included for comparisons. The results contradict a commonly held view that the Not Proven option attracts jurors away from returning a conviction. Instead, Not Proven more often supplants outright acquittals. Judged probabilities of guilt from jurors returning Not Proven are mid-range, in contrast to th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such models have been widely applied in analysing variables that are constrained between 0 and 1 and are either positively or negatively skewed. 11 , 12 , 13 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such models have been widely applied in analysing variables that are constrained between 0 and 1 and are either positively or negatively skewed. 11 , 12 , 13 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In psychology, Smithson [57] used beta regression to evaluate jurors' assessments of the probability of a defendant's guilt and their verdicts in trial courts. Beta regression has also been used to model quality-adjusted life years in health cost-effectiveness studies [58,59].…”
Section: Beta Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jurors fi nd it particularly diffi cult to apply different standards of proof to different elements of the case, as is often required in capital cases (e.g., beyond a reasonable doubt for aggravation but preponderance of the evidence for mitigation; Eisenberg & Wells, 1993 ). Related to the standard of proof, researchers should also continue research into the effect of providing juries with multiple verdict options, such as "guilty but mentally ill" (as opposed to simply guilty), "not proven" (as opposed to simply not guilty), and lesser included offenses (Smithson, Deady, & Gracik, 2007 ).…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%