1999
DOI: 10.1093/nq/46-3-328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Gums of Glutinous Heat’ and Euripides' Medea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Why, then, should we not take the word to mean primarily what it normally meant? Among the interpretations I have found, only Camé and Matthew Steggle identify the material substance as tree gum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Why, then, should we not take the word to mean primarily what it normally meant? Among the interpretations I have found, only Camé and Matthew Steggle identify the material substance as tree gum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…J. Sokol, as a symbol of menarche, or, “if actual fluids are supposed,” then menses (323n48); John Leonard, rejecting the idea that the Lady responds sexually, but entertaining the idea of “Comus's spillages,” or maybe just animal glue, which was applied hot (130); Debora Shuger, as analogue for Milton's nocturnal emissions (1‐3); James W. Broaddus, as vaginal secretions (passim); William Shullenberger, as “seminal” (84); Ronald Corthell, as possibly “emissions from Comus” (125n5). Nonsexual interpretations of the gums include Archer, as birdlime (99); Camé, as tree gum (51); Margaret Hoffman Kale, as Dionysian “sap” or life‐force (88); Matthew Steggle, as a “contact poison” like Medea's, based on tree gums (329); Beth Bradburn, as a nonsexual personal exudate representing the Lady's protective virtue (30‐31); and Leonard's alternate suggestion of hot animal glue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%