1985
DOI: 10.1016/0026-265x(85)90024-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gunshot residue determination by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…He combined the technology with SEM/Edx to analyze inorganic residues. Dahl et al (Dahl et al, 1985) reported the use of HPLC-EC for swabbed stabilizer detection. These stabilizers serve as an identification means of gunshot residue.…”
Section: Marshall and Tewari Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He combined the technology with SEM/Edx to analyze inorganic residues. Dahl et al (Dahl et al, 1985) reported the use of HPLC-EC for swabbed stabilizer detection. These stabilizers serve as an identification means of gunshot residue.…”
Section: Marshall and Tewari Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A procedure for the detection of gunshot residue through the presence of diphenylamine has been proposed. The method incorporates HPLC with electrochemical detection (359). The distribution, shape, and composition of GSR around wounds allows for an estimation of the distance between the gun and the target within the range of several inches to several feet (360).…”
Section: Trace Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent article (1) and the following correspondence (2,3) in Analytical Chemistry have in part been concerned with the characterization of firearms discharge residues by means of the diphenylamine (DPA) that they contain: DPA is normally found as the stabilizer in single base firearms propellants, and less often in double base propellants (4). The residual DPA may be identified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), with oxidative amperometric detection, e.g., oii the skin (5,6) and clothing (7) of subjects who have discharged a firearm. However, the usefulness of the technique in forensic science work has been restricted by the presence of interfering materials from skin surfaces particularly (5,7) and by the lack of information on the incidental amounts of DPA that might be found in the absence of firearms residues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%