2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guselkumab and risankizumab for psoriasis: a 44-week indirect real-life comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The patients in the Italian study had undergone several biologic therapies before risankizumab, without success, which means that they represented difficult-to-treat cases, which could be the reason for a marginally higher reduction in mean PASI score in our study [11]. A similar reduction of PASI score in a real-life setting was described by Megna et al and also by Ruggiero et al, who indirectly compared risankizumab with guselkumab [15,16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The patients in the Italian study had undergone several biologic therapies before risankizumab, without success, which means that they represented difficult-to-treat cases, which could be the reason for a marginally higher reduction in mean PASI score in our study [11]. A similar reduction of PASI score in a real-life setting was described by Megna et al and also by Ruggiero et al, who indirectly compared risankizumab with guselkumab [15,16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…It revealed that 84% of patients treated with Guselkumab were able to achieve a PASI 90 at week 48, compared to 70% of patients treated with Secukinumab. In addition, a real life study has shown that Guselkumab may be a valid treatment option in psoriatic patients who failed therapy with Ustekinumab and Secukinumab 32,33 . Our center has experience in the use of both the aforementioned drugs, however limited to this study we can only note that 6/46 patients (13.04%) actually needed to switch from Secukinumab to Guselkumab.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, risankizumab demonstrated superior efficacy compared with placebo [ 18 , 19 ] and several systemic therapies in active-comparator studies, including fumaric acid esters [ 20 ], adalimumab [ 21 ], and ustekinumab [ 18 ]. While there are currently no head-to-head studies comparing IL-23–targeted agents, recent real-world evidence demonstrates favorable efficacy and safety in patients who received long-term IL-23 treatment during routine clinical practice [ 22 – 24 ]. Secukinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits IL-17A, and has shown greater skin clearance than ustekinumab, an inhibitor of IL-12 and IL-23 [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%