2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-019-05538-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gusher in stapes surgery: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 1960s, Lempart, Shambaugh, Wood, and Zangenmeister spoke critically about this theory. The results presented in 1995 by Pirodda et al of the analysis performed on a large group of 200 patients operated for otosclerosis during a follow-up period of 13.4 +/-5.3 years after surgery did not show any deterioration of bone conduction in the operated and non-operated ears [7,8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In the 1960s, Lempart, Shambaugh, Wood, and Zangenmeister spoke critically about this theory. The results presented in 1995 by Pirodda et al of the analysis performed on a large group of 200 patients operated for otosclerosis during a follow-up period of 13.4 +/-5.3 years after surgery did not show any deterioration of bone conduction in the operated and non-operated ears [7,8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Moreover, the recommendation of pre-operative imaging in equivocal cases is even more compelling for young surgeons. This is because the interpretation of radiological findings is now essential for the training of young oto-surgeons, and also because a younger surgeon would have more difficulty managing a complication such as a gusher compared to an older surgeon with more experience [ 21 , 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 32 Treatment for the patients varied: one patient's mild perilymphatic leak was managed by covering the oval window, while in the other, switching to the microscope was necessary to handle the gusher and fill the tympanic cavity with temporalis muscle. 33 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%