26th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference 2008
DOI: 10.2514/6.2008-7192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gust Load Alleviation Flight Control System Design for a SensorCraft Vehicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…III, experimental results have demonstrated the effectiveness of INDI-QP-V in GLA, MLA, and simultaneous GLA and MLA tasks. In the literature, the LQG control is one of the most popular methods for load alleviation [10,13,30,35]. Therefore, the proposed INDI-QP-V control will be compared with LQG control.…”
Section: Comparisons With Linear Quadratic Gaussian Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…III, experimental results have demonstrated the effectiveness of INDI-QP-V in GLA, MLA, and simultaneous GLA and MLA tasks. In the literature, the LQG control is one of the most popular methods for load alleviation [10,13,30,35]. Therefore, the proposed INDI-QP-V control will be compared with LQG control.…”
Section: Comparisons With Linear Quadratic Gaussian Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9], the nonlinear flexible aircraft model is linearized successively, and then MPC controllers are designed at every linearization point. A linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) control is designed for a SensorCraft vehicle GLA problem in [10]. Besides, a wind tunnel experiment for alleviating the gust loads of a flexible wing with piezoelectric control is presented in [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…III, experimental results have demonstrated the effectiveness of INDI-QP-V in GLA, MLA and simultaneous GLA and MLA tasks. In the literature, the Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) control is one of the most popular methods for load alleviation [10,13,28,32]. Therefore, the proposed INDI-QP-V control will be compared to LQG control.…”
Section: Comparisons With Linear Quadratic Gaussian Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…achieved in overall design, aerodynamics, structure, aeroelasticity, flight control, prototype manufacturing, and flight testing of scaled prototypes [1][2][3][4][5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%