2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2376-6
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gustilo-Anderson Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
129
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
129
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The exclusion criteria were patients younger than 19 years, AO type B/C3 and Gustilo & Anderson Grade IIIC. 5 The average age of our patients was 42 years. We had a male predominance of 29 patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The exclusion criteria were patients younger than 19 years, AO type B/C3 and Gustilo & Anderson Grade IIIC. 5 The average age of our patients was 42 years. We had a male predominance of 29 patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…First, patients had to meet limb salvage injury criteria including one or more of the following: complex fractures (Gustilo-Anderson classification for open fractures [23] grades IIIC, IIIB, and selected IIIA), vascular injuries, major soft tissue injuries, and/or severe foot injuries. Major soft tissue injuries were degloving, avulsion, or severe crush injury, and were usually associated with extensive contamination.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the Gustilo and Anderson classification is never referred to. 17 The use of this classification is encouraged in order to show the reader a more precise portrait of fracture gravity and infectious risk. Further studies are needed to verify these important elements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%