2018
DOI: 10.3354/meps12775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gut fluorescence technique to quantify pigment feeding in Downs herring larvae

Abstract: Pecuchet et al. 2015). During the 'critical period' (sensu Hjort 1914), when fish larvae shift from endogenous to exogenous nutrition, poor feeding conditions can lead to higher mortality rates due to reduced growth, i.e. increased larval stage duration, and higher vulnerability to predation (Houde 2008, Robert et al. 2014, Wilson et al. 2018. Survival of fish larvae therefore depends on their ability to acquire, © Inter-Research 2018 • www.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an alternative, ingestion rates were estimated from the gut fluorescent content method (Mackas and Bohrer, 1976) which is often performed at laboratory or in situ to estimate zooplankton herbivory. It constitutes a fast and easy method to set up that could be carried out on a variety of planktonic (copepods, salps, and krill; Pakhomov et al, 1996;Perissinotto and Pakhomov, 1998;Lópes et al, 2007), pelagic (herring larvae, Denis et al, 2018), and benthic organisms (Díaz et al, 2012;Gaonkar and Anil, 2012). Although potential issues exist regarding gut pigments destruction ; Durbin and Campbell, 2007) and gut evacuation rate estimates , the method appeared well suited to quantify aggregate ingestion by copepods, using total chlorophyllian pigments as a proxy of prey biomass.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative, ingestion rates were estimated from the gut fluorescent content method (Mackas and Bohrer, 1976) which is often performed at laboratory or in situ to estimate zooplankton herbivory. It constitutes a fast and easy method to set up that could be carried out on a variety of planktonic (copepods, salps, and krill; Pakhomov et al, 1996;Perissinotto and Pakhomov, 1998;Lópes et al, 2007), pelagic (herring larvae, Denis et al, 2018), and benthic organisms (Díaz et al, 2012;Gaonkar and Anil, 2012). Although potential issues exist regarding gut pigments destruction ; Durbin and Campbell, 2007) and gut evacuation rate estimates , the method appeared well suited to quantify aggregate ingestion by copepods, using total chlorophyllian pigments as a proxy of prey biomass.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…copepod nauplii (Checkley, 1982). But, recent publications also point to microplankton such as ciliates and dinoflagellates, and even larger phytoplankton as important prey items (Denis et al, 2018;Illing et al, 2018). In our experiment, the critical period for herring larvae related to phase III (2 -25 DPH), where combined abundances/biomass of these potential prey organisms did not display sufficient treatment differences to explain higher fish larval survival under high pCO 2 , despite concentrations on the lower end of the ideal prey density of C. harengus (e.g.…”
Section: Possible Bottom-up Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%