2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jip.2016.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gut microbiota in Drosophila melanogaster interacts with Wolbachia but does not contribute to Wolbachia -mediated antiviral protection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
42
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
6
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, with the exception of Chryseobacterium , we were able to alter the nature and/or extent of these interactions by antibiotic treatment, without observing any effects on DENV susceptibility. Similar results were recently observed in Drosophila , where Wolbachia had significant interactions with the microbiome, but altering the microbiome composition by antibiotic treatment did not change susceptibility to Drosophila C virus [43]. These results suggest that Wolbachia’s interactions with the taxa identified in our study are unlikely to contribute to the anti-DENV phenotype in Ae .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Nevertheless, with the exception of Chryseobacterium , we were able to alter the nature and/or extent of these interactions by antibiotic treatment, without observing any effects on DENV susceptibility. Similar results were recently observed in Drosophila , where Wolbachia had significant interactions with the microbiome, but altering the microbiome composition by antibiotic treatment did not change susceptibility to Drosophila C virus [43]. These results suggest that Wolbachia’s interactions with the taxa identified in our study are unlikely to contribute to the anti-DENV phenotype in Ae .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Wolbachia as intracellular and all others as gut residents in order to evaluate the effect of the transplantation, as described elsewhere. 64…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A collective limitation of these studies is that the distinction between vitamin contributions by endosymbionts and gut microbiota have not been systematically confirmed as separate. Recent work indicates that antibiotic treatments restructure the gut microbiome in insects (Gendrin et al 2015; Ye et al 2016; Raymann et al 2017), as has also been seen in mammals (Antonopoulos et al 2009; Jernberg et al 2010; Buffie et al 2012). The implications of these treatments are unclear, as the gut microbiome is implicated in vitamin provisioning (Tatum 1939; Friend 1958; Blatch et al 2010; Piper et al 2014; Wong et al 2014; Nation 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%