2021
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab1383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GW190814: on the properties of the secondary component of the binary

Abstract: We show that the odds of the mass-gap (secondary) object in GW190814 being a neutron star (NS) improve if one allows for a stiff high-density equation of state (EoS) or a large spin. Since its mass is ∈ (2.50, 2.67) M⊙, establishing its true nature will make it either the heaviest NS or the lightest black hole (BH), and can have far-reaching implications on NS EoS and compact object formation channels. When limiting oneself to the NS hypothesis, we deduce the secondary’s properties by using a Bayesian framewor… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
50
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
7
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tidal effects are quantified through the dimensionless tidal deformability Λ, which scales roughly as ðR=mÞ 6 [26] for a NS of mass m and radius R, implying that the most massive-and thus most compact-NSs exhibit inherently weaker tidal interactions. As an result, the very nature of some ∼2-3 M ⊙ compact objects observed with GWs, such as the primary in GW190425 [27] and the secondary in GW190814 [28], cannot be determined beyond a reasonable doubt [29][30][31][32][33][34]. In the same density regime as the GWs, the electromagnetic counterpart to GW170817 may bound the EoS stiffness from below [35][36][37][38], though it is subject to significant systematic modeling uncertainty [39,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tidal effects are quantified through the dimensionless tidal deformability Λ, which scales roughly as ðR=mÞ 6 [26] for a NS of mass m and radius R, implying that the most massive-and thus most compact-NSs exhibit inherently weaker tidal interactions. As an result, the very nature of some ∼2-3 M ⊙ compact objects observed with GWs, such as the primary in GW190425 [27] and the secondary in GW190814 [28], cannot be determined beyond a reasonable doubt [29][30][31][32][33][34]. In the same density regime as the GWs, the electromagnetic counterpart to GW170817 may bound the EoS stiffness from below [35][36][37][38], though it is subject to significant systematic modeling uncertainty [39,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although its nature is uncertain (e.g. Most et al 2020;Tews et al 2021;Biswas et al 2021), and comparisons with various maximum NS mass estimates suggest its secondary may be a low-mass BH (Abbott et al 2020b;, we now entertain the scenario in which it is a NS and revisit our population inference under this assumption. Because GW190814 is such an outlier relative to the other GW observations, its inclusion in the population has a significant impact on the inferred mass distribution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The secondary component is either the lightest black hole or the heaviest NS ever discovered. However, this is still a question of debate [201][202][203][204][205][206][207][208][209].…”
Section: Gravitational Waves 421 Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%