2020
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/abc5b5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GWSkyNet: A Real-time Classifier for Public Gravitational-wave Candidates

Abstract: The rapid release of accurate sky localization for gravitational-wave (GW) candidates is crucial for multimessenger observations. During the third observing run of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo, automated GW alerts were publicly released within minutes of detection. Subsequent inspection and analysis resulted in the eventual retraction of a fraction of the candidates. Updates could be delayed by up to several days, sometimes issued during or after exhaustive multi-messenger follow-up campaigns. We introduce… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For science related to compact objects, ML algorithms have for example been developed to classify new pulsar candidates (Bethapudi & Desai 2018;Lin et al 2020;Balakrishnan et al 2021) as well as transient radio events such as fast radio bursts (Agarwal et al 2020). Other approaches have aimed at forecasting and analyzing gravitational-wave signals in real time (Cabero et al 2020;Gerosa et al 2020;Skliris et al 2020;Wei & Huerta 2020), interpreting gravitational-wave events in light of population synthesis (Wong & Gerosa 2019), or reconstructing the equation of state of a neutron star from observed quantities (Morawski & Bejger 2020).…”
Section: Machine-learning Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For science related to compact objects, ML algorithms have for example been developed to classify new pulsar candidates (Bethapudi & Desai 2018;Lin et al 2020;Balakrishnan et al 2021) as well as transient radio events such as fast radio bursts (Agarwal et al 2020). Other approaches have aimed at forecasting and analyzing gravitational-wave signals in real time (Cabero et al 2020;Gerosa et al 2020;Skliris et al 2020;Wei & Huerta 2020), interpreting gravitational-wave events in light of population synthesis (Wong & Gerosa 2019), or reconstructing the equation of state of a neutron star from observed quantities (Morawski & Bejger 2020).…”
Section: Machine-learning Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The noise events in the data set consist of 1267 glitches from the first two observing runs of Advanced LIGO and Virgo, identified in Cabero et al (2020) using catalogs of noise transients (Cabero et al 2019;Zevin et al 2017) and GW candidates from the second Open Gravitational-wave Catalog (Nitz et al 2019). To construct a sufficiently large and balanced data set, we use gravitational waveform models from the LALSuite package (LIGO Scientific Collaboration 2018) to simulate 1000 GW events for each astrophysical source type: BBH, BNS mergers, and NSBH mergers.…”
Section: Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To supplement the predictions available on GraceDB, Cabero et al (2020) introduced a "real-versus-noise" binary classifier, known as GWSkyNet, which leverages OPAs to inform potential EM follow-up seconds after the OPA is published. GWSkyNet achieves a test set accuracy of 93.5% and correctly predicts 37 of the 40 O3a events published in the second Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog (GWTC-2; Abbott et al 2021a), before the publication of this catalog.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Techniques from machine learning (ML), which originally belong to the fields of information and computer sciences, have found applications in many-body systems during the last a few years. Such examples contain studies associated with condensed matter physics including the critical phenomena of certain models , the high energy particle physics and astrophysics covering the analysis of the data relevant to jets and gravitational wave [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57], and the first principles material calculations like finding the density functionals . In some cases, the performance of these new approaches for exploring many-body physical systems is comparable with that of the traditional methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%