1991
DOI: 10.1306/d426777b-2b26-11d7-8648000102c1865d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gypsum-anhydrite differentiation by SEM using the back-scattered electron-signal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Back-scattered electron (BSE) images permitted the differentiation of gypsum and anhydrite in the samples. In the BSE images these minerals show very pronounced grey-level differences: anhydrite is bright, and gypsum is dark [73]. In addition to the obtained images of the rock surface, EDS point and areal analysis of the elemental composition were also carried out.…”
Section: Laboratory Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Back-scattered electron (BSE) images permitted the differentiation of gypsum and anhydrite in the samples. In the BSE images these minerals show very pronounced grey-level differences: anhydrite is bright, and gypsum is dark [73]. In addition to the obtained images of the rock surface, EDS point and areal analysis of the elemental composition were also carried out.…”
Section: Laboratory Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11). The gypsum-anhydrite differentiation by SEM-BSE is very effective as the resulting images represent "atomic number contrast" which, in turn, depend on the density and atomic number of the elements present in the test specimen (Jordan et al, 1991). As the average atomic number of anhydrite is 11 and that of gypsum is 7, the two phases can be clearly distinguished by grey level differences, with anhydrite appearing brighter than gypsum.…”
Section: Sem-eds and Plm Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%