1993
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199310000-00028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

H-2-Specific T Suppressor Cells I. Evidence for T Suppressor Inducer and Effector Molecules in Suppression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1995
1995
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since footpad testing is done within 18 h of transfer, and the transfer of control cells between the two groups had no effect on the level of DH, however, it is possible that the lack o f suppression resulted from a lack of cell cooperation rather than from an alloge neic effect. The requirement for the CD4+ cell in the pathway lead ing to the development of MAN-specific CD8+ effectorsuppressor cells is consistent with studies involving (a) ani mal models and fungi other than C. albicans [14,28], (b) human peripheral blood lymphocytes and H-2-specific sup pression [29], (c) suppression of immunoglobulin synthesis by T cell lymphocytic leukemia cells [30] and (d) Concanavalin A-induced suppression of immunoglobulin synthesis by murine cells [31]. A CD4+ suppressor-inducer cell has also been described among human T cells which induced suppression of immunoglobulin production in vitro [32], as well as among human T cells responding in vitro to the solu ble antigen PPD [33], Moreover.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Since footpad testing is done within 18 h of transfer, and the transfer of control cells between the two groups had no effect on the level of DH, however, it is possible that the lack o f suppression resulted from a lack of cell cooperation rather than from an alloge neic effect. The requirement for the CD4+ cell in the pathway lead ing to the development of MAN-specific CD8+ effectorsuppressor cells is consistent with studies involving (a) ani mal models and fungi other than C. albicans [14,28], (b) human peripheral blood lymphocytes and H-2-specific sup pression [29], (c) suppression of immunoglobulin synthesis by T cell lymphocytic leukemia cells [30] and (d) Concanavalin A-induced suppression of immunoglobulin synthesis by murine cells [31]. A CD4+ suppressor-inducer cell has also been described among human T cells which induced suppression of immunoglobulin production in vitro [32], as well as among human T cells responding in vitro to the solu ble antigen PPD [33], Moreover.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%