2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.11.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

H∞ and H2 memory static output-feedback control design for uncertain discrete-time linear systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even in the case of state‐feedback (Cy(αk)=I), the structure of matrix Acl(α(k)) in (3) poses a technical difficulty in the sense of deriving convex synthesis condition for the gains Ki(α(k)). In the literature of memory control, the usual technique to derive LMIs is constrained slack variables, which is a source of conservativeness 28‐31,33,34 . As presented next, this article proposes a strategy that does not resort to constrained slack variables to construct the control gains in terms of change of variables, such that the gains appear explicitly in the optimization procedure.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Even in the case of state‐feedback (Cy(αk)=I), the structure of matrix Acl(α(k)) in (3) poses a technical difficulty in the sense of deriving convex synthesis condition for the gains Ki(α(k)). In the literature of memory control, the usual technique to derive LMIs is constrained slack variables, which is a source of conservativeness 28‐31,33,34 . As presented next, this article proposes a strategy that does not resort to constrained slack variables to construct the control gains in terms of change of variables, such that the gains appear explicitly in the optimization procedure.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To perform at least one comparison with a technique capable to produce memory controllers, the database of systems is tested considering the parameters as time‐invariant. In this case the method from Frezzatto et al 31 (FOP) can be applied. The overall result of A1 is 99.8% with m = 2 and FOP gives 73.1% with m = 4 memories.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although, some novel and valuable approaches are developed, this problem is still an open challenge [12]. It is mainly because, there is a lack of a suitable and acceptable approach that is able to solve this problem by a set of sufficient and necessary conditions [13,14]. Among various approaches in this area, the Lyapunov-based methods are the most widely popular and common approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%