2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12555-010-0203-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

H ∞ control for networked systems with data packet dropout

Abstract: This paper considers the H ∞ control problem of networked control systems, respectively, for the two cases that system state is available and unavailable. It is assumed that there exists a communication network in the feedback loop, and multiple data packet dropouts may happen. An estimation method is introduced to compensate the lost data. And then, the design of H ∞ control is considered for the states available and states unavailable, respectively, and some sufficient conditions are derived such that the cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, a state predictor is required (considering that (1)-(2) could be unstable).  Due to the packet loss and time-varying delays, the 3 As a one-channel feedback setup is considered, the controller-toactuator delay does not appear. While the sensor-to-controller delay can be known at the controller device and considered to calculate the current control action, the controller-to-actuator delay (if considered) is not known at this time; therefore, no exact correction for this delay can be made in this moment, requiring some control techniques to deal with it (  H proposals, fuzzy methodologies, gain scheduling approaches, etc; see some references at the beginning of section 1).…”
Section: State Feedback Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…So, a state predictor is required (considering that (1)-(2) could be unstable).  Due to the packet loss and time-varying delays, the 3 As a one-channel feedback setup is considered, the controller-toactuator delay does not appear. While the sensor-to-controller delay can be known at the controller device and considered to calculate the current control action, the controller-to-actuator delay (if considered) is not known at this time; therefore, no exact correction for this delay can be made in this moment, requiring some control techniques to deal with it (  H proposals, fuzzy methodologies, gain scheduling approaches, etc; see some references at the beginning of section 1).…”
Section: State Feedback Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, if the closed-loop poles are desired to be located in s=-2 and s=-1, the next state feedback controller gain is obtained: K= [3,2]. For simplicity, the observer is designed with a uniform dropout pattern N k =4, and locating its poles in .…”
Section: Robust Stability Vs Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In point-to-point system the number of needed wire increases very much proportional to the number of sensor and actuator. Because of this problem networked control systems (NCS) are widely used in control areas [1,2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the communication networks in control loops also have some constraints such as time delays and packet dropouts, which complicate the analysis and design of NCSs. Great efforts have been made on stability analysis, controller design for stabilization and performance of NCSs in the past several years [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%