2010 12th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icfhr.2010.118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

H-DIBCO 2010 - Handwritten Document Image Binarization Competition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
106
0
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
106
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, local and global methods are applied to the normalized images and the final results are obtained by combining these two complementary results. This method shows the state-of-the-art performance in the 2009 and 2010 Document Image Binarization Contests (DIBCOs) [5,24].…”
Section: Our Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, local and global methods are applied to the normalized images and the final results are obtained by combining these two complementary results. This method shows the state-of-the-art performance in the 2009 and 2010 Document Image Binarization Contests (DIBCOs) [5,24].…”
Section: Our Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These algorithms are commonly used as baseline for comparison with new algorithms, for example, in competitions, such as the Document Image Binarization Contest (DIBCO) held at the International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR) [12,37,39] or the Competition on Handwritten Document Image Binarization (H-DIBCO) held at the International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition (ICFHR) [30,36,38,40]. In the last two binarization competitions, in 2014 and 2016, the binarization algorithm by Howe [19] and derivations thereof using different preprocessing steps have won these contests.…”
Section: Image Binarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The document image binarization contest datasets from DIBCO 2009 [12], H-DIBCO 2010 [36], DIBCO 2011 [37], H-DIBCO 2012 [38], DIBCO 2013 [39], H-DIBCO 2014 [30] and H-DIBCO 2016 [40], were used in all experiments. These datasets contain 86 images in total, of which 65 images are handwritten and 21 images are printed documents.…”
Section: Experiments Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As illustrated in Figure 1(a), Historical documents are degraded due to bleed through. In addition, handwritten text documents are degraded due to a certain amount of variation in terms of the stroke width, stroke brightness, stroke connection, and document background as illustrated in Figure 1 [4] held under the framework of the International Conference on Frontiers in Handwritten Recognition show recent efforts on this issue. We participated in the DIBCO 2009 and our background estimation method [5] performs the best among entries of 43 algorithms submitted from 35 international research groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%