H. Engelhardt, H.-P. Kohler, and A. Prskawetz (eds), Causal Analysis in Population Studies: Concepts, Methods, Applications

Hoem, Jan M.

doi:10.1007/s10680-010-9218-6

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…3 As a further robustness check we also varied the age range (20-24; 25-29; 30-34) and the age bandwidth (36-40; 36-41; 37-40). 4 For a recent debate on the application of causal inference designs in population studies see: Bhrolcháin and Dyson 2007;Duncan et al 2007;Engelhardt, Kohler, and Fürnkranz-Prskawetz 2009;Fricke 2003;Hoem 2010;Moffitt 2003Moffitt , 2005Neyer and Andersson 2008;Russo and Williamson 2011;Smith 2009Smith , 2014Xie 2007Xie , 2013 In a different context, Dinas and Stoker (2014) (born between 1964 and 1975) has been conducted (figures not shown but available upon request). The two trends do not fit perfectly (the difference is roughly around 5%) but they are parallel.…”

Section: Complementary Analysesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The causal effect of the great recession on childlessness of white American women

Comolli

Bernardi

2015

IZA J Labor Econ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many studies have documented a negative association between macroeconomic indicators and fertility in times of economic crisis. These studies are based on research designs that do not allow for excluding that the observed association is driven by confounders. The aim of the present paper is to estimate the causal effect of the Great Recession on cohorts' childlessness in the United States. We apply a difference-in-difference approach to the probability of childlessness in two pseudo-cohorts of white women who entered the age of 34-36 years old being childless before the crisis, in 2004, and at the onset of the crisis, in 2007. Our identification strategy relies on the assumption that these two adjacent cohorts of women differ only because the latter cohort lived some critical years of reproductive life during the Great Recession period. We then study how many childless women aged 34-36 had a child when they were 37-39, between the years 2004 and 2007 for the control group and between the years 2007 and 2010 for the treatment group. We argue that an increase of childlessness at the age 37-39 is likely to lead to an increase in permanent childlessness, since major catch-up processes are unlikely after age 40. We replicate the analysis on two datasets: the American Community Survey and the Fertility Supplement of the Current Population Survey. Our findings suggest that the Great Recession has had a positive, though mild, effect on childlessness of white women at about the age of 40 in the US.JEL codes: Z0, J1, J110, J130, C21*

show abstract