2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcon.2018.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

H∞ generalized dynamic unknown inputs observer design for discrete LPV systems. Application to wind turbine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…, M of Θ and Φ, respectively. Thereupon, let us consider the regions (8) and (18) and the inclusion E ⊆ V described by (19) to obtain (32).…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, M of Θ and Φ, respectively. Thereupon, let us consider the regions (8) and (18) and the inclusion E ⊆ V described by (19) to obtain (32).…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, many nonlinearities can be represented as varying parameters that depend on endogenous signals, for example, states and inputs [17], which broadens the applicability of the design methodology to nonlinear plants. Examples of successful applications of the LPV paradigm are-wind turbines [18], vehicles [19,20] and drones [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research is funded by Funds for Science and Technology Development of the University of Danang under project number B2020-DN06- 21. research trend in the LPV community [2]. In the literature, the observers of this new class take various structures, from the classical form [3], the descriptor form [4], [5] to the two-DOF [6] or the generalized one [7], [8]. The main objective of this work is to extend the unified formulation of unknown input observers [9], [10] for NLPV systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, numerous studies have explored the application of this type of observer in the continuous‐time domain, as evidenced by various works in the literature such as those by Naami et al, 33 Gao et al, 34 Boutat‐Baddas et al, 35 and Osorio‐Gordillo et al 36 However, limited attention has been paid to its discrete‐time equivalent. Notably, Reference 37 studied this observer for linear systems, while Reference 38 focused on linear parameters‐varying (LPV) systems. Nevertheless, these earlier studies did not take into account nonlinear terms and delays, which served as the main motivation for our current work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%