1997
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0113851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

H∞ loop-shaping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to accomplish these performances and to insure robust stability with respect to modeling uncertainty and reduced sensitivity at measurement noises, the following modified loopshaping configuration is used (see e.g. [1], [10]).…”
Section: Control Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to accomplish these performances and to insure robust stability with respect to modeling uncertainty and reduced sensitivity at measurement noises, the following modified loopshaping configuration is used (see e.g. [1], [10]).…”
Section: Control Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…denotes the controller. According with the general loop-shaping methodology described in [10], K must be determined such that the norm of the mapping…”
Section: Fig 2: Modified Loop-shaping Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The design procedure is based on a modified version of the so-called two degrees of freedom (2 DOF) H ∞ loop-shaping which allows to handle simultaneously robustness stability, model tracking and disturbances attenuation requirements. The initial method proposed in [9] have been previously used for the autopilot design of the aircraft longitudinal and lateral dynamics (see [10], [11], [12]). In the present paper the 2 DOF H ∞ loopshaping procedure is used for the design of the HH autopilot of an unconventional UAV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Εφαρμογές ομαδοποίηση σειρά-προς-σειρά έτσι ώστε η αναμενόμενη συχνότητα της κάθε ομάδας να μην είναι μικρότερη του ένα. 0 τρόπος ομαδοποίησης είναι αυτός που ακολούθησε οPapageorgiou (1986) στο πρώτο και τρίτο παράδειγμα για να ελέγξει την προσαρμογή των διδιάστατων 'Short' Ι και II με εκτιμητές από τη μέθοδο των ροπών και ο Επίλογος πρόσθετη εκμετάλλευση της δημιουργίας της κατανομής Neyman Type A, από τη σύνθεση δύο Poisson τυχαίων μεταβλητών. Θα μπορούσαμε να πούμε, ότι ο χειρισμός του προβλήματος στο τέταρτο κεφάλαιο Βασίστηκε σε 'σύνθεση' ιδεών από τα δύο προηγούμενα.…”
unclassified