1998
DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

H.M.'s Language Production Deficits: Implications for Relations between Memory, Semantic Binding, and the Hippocampal System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
89
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
7
89
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The hippocampus and the parahippocampal cortex has been thought to be exclusively involved in episodic memory, however, recent neuroimaging research has shown the importance of these regions in semantic processing [48,49]. The role of the hippocampal formation in semantic tasks is also supported by the findings of reduced language production capacity in patients with hippocampal damage [50]. …”
Section: Hippocampal Activationsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The hippocampus and the parahippocampal cortex has been thought to be exclusively involved in episodic memory, however, recent neuroimaging research has shown the importance of these regions in semantic processing [48,49]. The role of the hippocampal formation in semantic tasks is also supported by the findings of reduced language production capacity in patients with hippocampal damage [50]. …”
Section: Hippocampal Activationsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…where "make it" can mean to make a physical object, or to achieve a goal, or to arrive on time). Compared to healthy volunteers, H.M. detected significantly fewer sentence ambiguities (MacKay et al, 1998a,b); his descriptions of the ambiguous sentences were rated as less clear, concise, and coherent (MacKay et al, 1998a); and his conversations about his early childhood were rated by blind judges as less coherent and comprehensible (MacKay et al, 1998a).…”
Section: A Dissociation Within Lexical Memory? Learning Vs Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all three claims of Kensinger et al (2001) are in conflict with other evidence indicating that: (1) H.M. exhibits recent deficits in processing low-frequency (LF) words James, 2001, 2002); (2) from 1983 to 1997, H.M. exhibited exaggerated age-linked declines in processing LF words that he knew and used correctly in 1970 James, 2001, 2002); (3) H.M. exhibited syntax-level processing deficits in more than 30 sources of evidence from 1967-1973(Lackner, 1974MacKay, Burke, and Stewart, 1998a;MacKay, Stewart, and Burke, 1998b) to 1997-1999, 2002MacKay, James, Taylor, and Marian, in press).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%