1976
DOI: 10.1307/mmj/1029001620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

$H^p$-derivatives of Blaschke products.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper we extend Linden's theorem [4] when n A N and p > ð1 À aÞ=n where a is in ð0; 1=ðn þ 1ÞÞ. To do this we extend our results obtained in [3] by considering upper bounds to the integral means of the n'th derivative of certain infinite Blaschke products for n > 1.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper we extend Linden's theorem [4] when n A N and p > ð1 À aÞ=n where a is in ð0; 1=ðn þ 1ÞÞ. To do this we extend our results obtained in [3] by considering upper bounds to the integral means of the n'th derivative of certain infinite Blaschke products for n > 1.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In 1976 C. N. Linden [4] gave a generalization to higher order derivatives of a theorem of Protas, which gives a su‰cient condition for the n'th derivative B ðnÞ ðzÞ of an infinite Blaschke product BðzÞ to belong to the class H p for each p in ð0; ð1 À aÞ=n when a is in ð0; 1=ðn þ 1ÞÞ. He also gave some relevant counterexamples to indicate to some extent that his results are the best obtainable for general Blaschke products.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar examples have been considered previously by Linden [3], and it is not di½cult to follow similar applications.…”
Section: Some Counterexamplesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Every Blaschke product that satisfies (a) has derivatives B(n) E HP for some p = p(n) (see [5]), and then B(n) E N+ . Trivially B extends analitically to T -{1}, yet B cannot be expresed as a quotient f, /f2 with f1 , f2 E A-(B), because E, that verifies (b) and (c), is not the zero set of any function in A°°(D) (see [7]).…”
Section: (C)mentioning
confidence: 99%