2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1150119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habit Formation, Surplus Consumption and Return Predictability: International Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li and Zhong () and Engsted et al. () confirm the expected sign of the SCR in predictive stock market regressions for a number of international markets. The latter authors also report a negative and usually significant impact of the SCR on log bond returns in these markets in line with predictions from the Wachter () model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Li and Zhong () and Engsted et al. () confirm the expected sign of the SCR in predictive stock market regressions for a number of international markets. The latter authors also report a negative and usually significant impact of the SCR on log bond returns in these markets in line with predictions from the Wachter () model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Predictive regressions using the SCR are presented by Li (), Li and Zhong (), Møller (), and Engsted et al. (). Using US data, Li () and Møller () report a significant negative impact of the log SCR on the cumulative log excess return on a broad stock market index as expected given the countercyclical nature of the risk premium in the model of Campbell and Cochrane ().…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there is some evidence of time-varying counter-cyclical riskaversion in recent years, the Campbell-Cochrane model does not produce lower pricing errors or more plausible parameter values than the CRRA model. In Engsted et al (2008) we present further international evidence on the relative performance of the two models. There seems to be quite large cross-country differences in the ability of the Campbell-Cochrane model to explain asset return movements over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…By contrast, under the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) developed by Sharpe (1964), which is widely used in empirical literature, risk is measured particularly in markets outside the US. Although there are studies on the CCAPM based on different markets (see, for example, Engsted et al, 2007), the bulk of the literature on CCAPM is limited to the US market. In this study, we focus on the Australian market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%