2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2018.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitat complexity affects benthic harmful dinoflagellate assemblages in the fringing reef of Rawa Island, Malaysia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
35
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
2
35
2
Order By: Relevance
“…cell −1 , respectively. Cell densities were found to be relatively low (never exceeding 100 cells 100 cm −2 ) compared to values as high as 10,000 cells 100 cm −2 reported in Belize [34] or 1200 cells 100 cm −2 in Malaysia [35]. Interpretation of sampling data with limited spatial and temporal scale, as conducted in this study (one sampling event for microalgae), requires cautious judgement considering the known geographical and temporal variability in distributions of Gambierdiscus spp.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…cell −1 , respectively. Cell densities were found to be relatively low (never exceeding 100 cells 100 cm −2 ) compared to values as high as 10,000 cells 100 cm −2 reported in Belize [34] or 1200 cells 100 cm −2 in Malaysia [35]. Interpretation of sampling data with limited spatial and temporal scale, as conducted in this study (one sampling event for microalgae), requires cautious judgement considering the known geographical and temporal variability in distributions of Gambierdiscus spp.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Interpretation of sampling data with limited spatial and temporal scale, as conducted in this study (one sampling event for microalgae), requires cautious judgement considering the known geographical and temporal variability in distributions of Gambierdiscus spp. [35,36]. It highlights the complexity of developing an environmental monitoring strategy for seafood safety and disease management, with a need to conduct concomitant surveillance of toxins in fish for efficient monitoring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Habitat preference likely varies between the two species, as the former was found attached to macroalgae and the latter was found in sediments (own observation). Several studies have documented the benthic distribution of Prorocentrum (Vila et al, 2001;Okolodkov et al, 2007Okolodkov et al, , 2014Yong et al, 2018). But as yet, very few studies focused on the ecological adaptation and habitat preference of benthic Prorocentrum at interspecific levels, this is not a topic to cover in this study but will be a subject to explore in the future.…”
Section: Taxonomic Remarks Of Two Toxic Prorocentrum Species Found Inmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Most research has focused on the environmental variability and host-epiphytic dynamics through the analysis of the experimental responses of benthic dinoflagellates to variations of temperature, irradiance, nutrient concentration and salinity (Bomber et al, 1988;Chinain et al, 1999;Hales et al, 1999;Anderson et al, 2008;Lartigue et al, 2009;Kibler et al, 2015), as well as the substrate preference of some dinoflagellate species (Lobel et al, 1988;Bomber et al, 1989;Nakahara et al, 1996;Parsons and Preskitt, 2007;Parsons et al, 2011;Rains and Parsons, 2015), and the monitoring of dinoflagellate abundance on several substrates and macroalgae (Morton and Faust, 1997;Vila et al, 2001;Okolodkov et al, 2007Okolodkov et al, , 2014Moreira et al, 2012;Cohu et al, 2013). Also, other features such as depth, the water motion and habitat structure have been studied in relation to abundance and occurrence of the benthic dinoflagellates (Richlen and Lobel, 2011;Cohu et al, 2013;Boisnoir et al, 2018;Yong et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%